New audio from the judge who released Cambridge gunman Tyler Brown

🚨 This audio is INSANE. The judge says she has been advised by experienced officers how dangerous he is but she’s ignoring them

In 2020, Tyler Brown fired on police officers and only got 5 years. He has a 20 year criminal record

Judge audio “I do realize I'm kind of taking a chance on you. — when people stand up, police, experienced police officers, experienced probation officers, and they tell me this guy is a danger to the community”

She acknowledged the risk but only sentenced him to 5 year despite prosecutors requesting 10–12 years and strong opposition from both police and probation

- 20+ year criminal history: Includes violence against police and civilians, firearms offenses, drugs, assault with a dangerous weapon

- He committed a stabbing in 2014

- Armed robbery in Michigan

- He was on probation at the time of the 2020 shooting.

- Released on parole in March 2025, about a year before the recent Cambridge incident

 

M innesota Democrat Rep. Aisha Gomez told Republican Rep. Elliott Engen to “go f*cking sh**t himself”

 A liberal friend (PhD candidate in nursing) posted that Project 2025 would end tenure for all college professors. I found the section on tenure, which only addressed US military academies.

Right there in black & white.

She still insisted she was right.

 

 T his new PhD dissertation from the University of Victoria’s School of Indigenous Governance contains two typos in the first sentence.

The author uses her “intersecting lenses of being a chronically ill neurodivergent Two-Spirit Mississauga Nishnaabe Lucbanin artist and scholar” to convey the importance of “ancestral knowledge encodements” through beadwork.

She claims “colonization” is why we think “body, mind, spirit, land, and material expressions of culture” are separate things.

 

You missed the fact that school officials deceived this young girl and her parents, promising them that boys and girls would sleep on separate floors. It wasn’t until this 11-year-old girl was on the trip—far from home—that she discovered her expected bedmate was a boy.

 

She was then forced to stand up against school authorities and defend her own privacy in the moment, late at night. They initially treated her as if her concerns were not legitimate, moving her to a different bed in the room. This backfired when the other roommates wanted the boy to move beds too. So this little girl had to muster the courage to voice her concerns a second time. The school finally relented and moved her to another room, but told her to lie about the reason why.

 

Any reasonable person can see how outrageous this is. No child should have to defend her own privacy against a school policy that puts her in jeopardy. And no school district should make it a policy to deceive parents.

 

Furthermore: not all kids have the ability or opportunity to stand up for themselves. Another family in our lawsuit has a son whose sleeping arrangements and showers were supervised by a female (identifying as non-binary) at a week-long school camp. Several of the boys were so uncomfortable that they skipped showers and changed their clothes inside their sleeping bags.

 

This is inexcusable. It is adults’ responsibility to stand up for children—not children’s responsibility to stand up for themselves.

 

This could easily be avoided with a commonsense policy that allows parents to stay informed and opt their children out of mixed-sex sleeping arrangements ahead of time—protecting the privacy of ALL children involved. But despite our requests, the school district repeatedly refused to do this.

 

So yes, we sued. In fact, let me put every district in America on notice right now: if you treat students and parents this way, prepare for a lawsuit.

NEW: A disabled woman is suing homeless services in Portland, Oregon, after she was denied rent relief due to her low score on the city's race-based prioritization rubric, which awards more points for requesting "culturally specific services" than for having a disability.🧵

Though the rubric awards extra points when the disability impacts access to housing, it awards even more to gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender people who speak English as a second language, meaning that identity factors can outweigh disability status.